Hi, Not much to say really... Signed-off-by: Mark Knibbs <markk@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- diff -upN linux-3.17/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c.orig linux-3.17/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c --- linux-3.17/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c.orig 2014-10-05 20:23:04.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-3.17/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c 2014-10-09 12:32:53.000000000 +0100 @@ -1191,9 +1191,9 @@ static void scsi_sequential_lun_scan(str sparse_lun = 0; /* - * If less than SCSI_1_CSS, and no special lun scaning, stop + * If less than SCSI_1_CCS, and no special lun scanning, stop * scanning; this matches 2.4 behaviour, but could just be a bug - * (to continue scanning a SCSI_1_CSS device). + * (to continue scanning a SCSI_1_CCS device). * * This test is broken. We might not have any device on lun0 for * a sparselun device, and if that's the case then how would we -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
