On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Finn Thain <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > > > + if (IS_A_TT())
>> > > > + instance->irq = IRQ_TT_MFP_SCSI;
>> > > > + else
>> > > > + instance->irq = IRQ_NONE;
>> > > >
>> > > platform_device resource?
>> > >
>> >
>> > If I thought it possible to parameterize the driver such that it never
>> > had to test IS_A_TT(), I'd probably agree that this would be more
>> > elegant.
>> >
>> > Otherwise I'd prefer not to have parts of the logic separated off into
>> > the platform resources while the remaining logic remains in the driver
>> > itself.
>> >
>> > While I don't think platform resources are desirable in this driver, I
>> > would like to hear Michael's views.
>> >
>>
>> The IRQ is a good candidate to be passed via platform data.
>
> Geert didn't say so, but after thinking about his review comments I
> imagine that he wants all the Atari IRQ numbers kept in one place and all
> the Mac IRQ numbers in a different place, and so on. Makes sense.
In the end, it's the same SCSI chip.
The "only" differences are resources, interrupts, DMA, and glue logic.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
