On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 10:11:26PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 02:57:17PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > + queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &priv->attach_work->work); > > Tejun, > > based on my testing so far using system_highpri_wq instead of > system_unbound_wq yields close to par / better boot times > than synchronous probe support for all modules. How set are > you on using system_unbound_wq? About to punt out a new > series which also addresses built-in. Nevermind, folks can change this later with better empirical testing than I can provide and right now the differences I see are not too conclusive and I suspect we'll see more of a difference once the right built-in drivers are selected to probe asynchrounously. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
