On Mon 2014-09-22 13:23:54, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Monday, September 22, 2014 09:49:06 PM Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Thu 2014-09-11 13:23:54, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:59:25PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > > > > Yes, but we mostly do this anyway. SCSI for instance does asynchronous > > > > scanning of attached devices (once the cards are probed) > > > > > > What would it do it card was a bit slow to probe? > > > > > > > but has a sync > > > > point for ordering. > > > > > > Quite often we do not really care about ordering of devices. I mean, > > > does it matter if your mouse is discovered before your keyboard or > > > after? > > > > Actually yes, I suspect it does. > > > > I do evtest /dev/input/eventX by hand, occassionaly. It would be > > annoying if they moved between reboots. > > I am sorry but you will have to cope with such annoyances. It' snot like we > fail to boot the box here. > > The systems are now mostly hot-pluggable and userland is supposed to > handle it, and it does, at least for input devices. If you want stable naming > use udev facilities to rename devices as needed or add needed symlinks (by-id, > etc.). Well, it would be nice if udev was not mandatory. Do the sync points for ordering actually cost us something? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
