On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 08:09:06AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 02:01:41AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 07:59:24AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > "[PATCHSET percpu/for-3.18] percpu_ref: implement switch_to_atomic/percpu()" > > > > > > looks way to big for 3.17, and the regression was introduced in the 3.17 > > > merge window. I'm not sure what was broken before, but it defintively > > > survived a lot of testing. > > > > Do we even care about fixing it for 3.17? scsi-mq isn't enabled by > > default even for 3.18. The open-coded percpu ref thing was subtly > > broken there. It'd be difficult to trigger but I'm fairly sure it'd > > crap out in the wild once in a blue moon. > > It's compiled in by default, and people are extremly eager to test it. Ugh, I don't know. It's not like we have a very good baseline we can go back to and reverting it for -stable and then redoing it seems kinda excessive for a yet experimental feature. Jens? -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
