On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 12:25:29PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 08:19:12PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> > On the systemd side of things it should enable this sysctl and for >> > older kernels what should it do? >> >> Supposing the change is backported via -stable, it can try to set the >> sysctl on all kernels. If the knob doesn't exist, the fix is not >> there and nothing can be done about it. > > The more I think about it, the more I think this should be a > per-insmod instance thing rather than a system-wide switch. Agreed, a good use case that comes to mind would be systemd's modules-load.d lists used by systemd services to require modules, the hooks there however likely expect probe to complete as part of the service, since the timeout is not applicable to these the synchronous probe for them would be good while systemd would use async probe for regular modules. > Currently > the kernel param code doesn't allow a generic param outside the ones > specified by the module itself but adding support for something like > driver.async_load=1 shouldn't be too difficult, applying that to > existing systems shouldn't be much more difficult than a system-wide > switch, and it'd be siginificantly cleaner than fiddling with driver > blacklist. Agreed. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
