Hi Robert, On 09/10/2014 06:08 PM, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: linux-scsi-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-scsi- >> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hans de Goede >> Sent: Wednesday, 10 September, 2014 6:47 AM >> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman >> Cc: linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >> stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Hans de Goede >> Subject: [PATCH 18/21] uas: Use scsi_print_command >> >> Use scsi_print_command to print commands during errors, rather then >> printing >> the rather meaningless pointer to the command. >> >> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/usb/storage/uas.c | 5 +++-- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/uas.c b/drivers/usb/storage/uas.c >> index 46b8788..220f4c7 100644 >> --- a/drivers/usb/storage/uas.c >> +++ b/drivers/usb/storage/uas.c >> @@ -229,8 +229,8 @@ static void uas_log_cmd_state(struct scsi_cmnd >> *cmnd, const char *caller) >> struct uas_cmd_info *ci = (void *)&cmnd->SCp; >> >> scmd_printk(KERN_INFO, cmnd, >> - "%s %p tag %d, >> inflight:%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s\n", >> - caller, cmnd, uas_get_tag(cmnd), >> + "%s tag %d inflight:%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s ", >> + caller, uas_get_tag(cmnd), >> (ci->state & SUBMIT_STATUS_URB) ? " s-st" : "", >> (ci->state & ALLOC_DATA_IN_URB) ? " a-in" : "", >> (ci->state & SUBMIT_DATA_IN_URB) ? " s-in" : "", >> @@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ static void uas_log_cmd_state(struct scsi_cmnd >> *cmnd, const char *caller) >> (ci->state & COMMAND_COMPLETED) ? " done" : "", >> (ci->state & COMMAND_ABORTED) ? " abort" : "", >> (ci->state & IS_IN_WORK_LIST) ? " work" : ""); >> + scsi_print_command(cmnd); >> } > > The SCSI midlayer already does a scsi_print_command, under > the MLCOMPLETE logging level. Printing the command in > the LLD is redundant; Printing the scmd pointer was not, > as it matched the prints in the SCSI midlayer, letting > you find all the messages for a command. > > In Hannes' logging patch series, Christoph Hellwig suggested > printing the block layer tag instead of the scmd pointer. > If UAS uses that tag directly, then the uas_get_tag() print > already does that. If they're not identical (looks like > they differ by 2), then you might want to print both. > > More general comment: > scsi-mq stress testing has shown that calling printk > on each command with an error is problematic. If the > system runs into hundreds or thousands of errors, the > printks take so long they induce more timeouts and errors. > > As discussed in the threads by Yoshihiro YUNOMAE and Hannes > Reinecke, you might want to: > * tuck the scmd_printk inside SCSI_LOG_LLCOMPLETE so > the user can control the verbosity > * use a _ratelimited version of each print > * plan to add and eventually switch to tracepoints, so > logging doesn't have performance impacts Thanks for your feedback, indeed we may need to cut down on the logging in the future. ATM our focus is mostly on getting the UAS driver work reliable with all the (cheap) uas hardware out there. Most errors we are getting are not disk errors, but errors due to the usb <-> sata bridge chip not groking some command. Being able to directly see the command which is tripping up the bridge in a dmesg output without needing to tell the user to take extra action is very helpful at this point in the uas' driver development. Regards, Hans -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
