Hi, On 09/10/2014 01:56 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote: > On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 13:48 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Note this series is NOT intended for stable, but I accidentally >> had "cc = stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" in my .git/config when sending >> this series, please ignore for stable. >> >> NACK for stable. > > If this is not for stable, what do you intend to do about > the problems in stable? For example patch#01 of this series > looks like clear stable material to me. The plan for stable is mostly, as lame as that is, to make sure we get all the right quirks in place so that error handling does not get triggered, for now. I agree that once this set has seen wider testing, we should reconsider, and probably add it, to stable. But at this point in time I'm worried that it may cause regressions, and as such it is not stable material atm IHMO. Regards, Hans -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
