Re: [PATCH 0/8] block: per-distpatch_queue flush machinery

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Ming,
>
> thanks for doing this work!
>
> I've only taken a very cursory look at the series and I like most of it.
>
> But can you explain why you're not simply incrementing the number of
> allocated requests in the blk-mq request allocation code instead of
> allocating the flush request separately in the last patch?

Requests in tag_set may be shared by more than one queues, but flush
rq per hctx can't be shared by request queues at all.

Also it is simple to put it inside the introduce blk_flush_queue.

Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux