On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 16:23 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 08/26/2014 04:14 PM, David Vrabel wrote: > > On 18/08/14 10:31, jgross@xxxxxxxx wrote: > >> From: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Add myself as maintainer for the Xen pvSCSI stuff. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> MAINTAINERS | 8 ++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > >> index aefa948..360f86f 100644 > >> --- a/MAINTAINERS > >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS > >> @@ -10086,6 +10086,14 @@ S: Supported > >> F: drivers/block/xen-blkback/* > >> F: drivers/block/xen* > >> > >> +XEN PVSCSI DRIVERS > >> +M: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> > >> +L: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (moderated for non-subscribers) > > > > You should add the appropriate scsi list here > > (linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I presume?) > > Really? Xen PCI and Xen Block susbsystems don't have an according entry. > James, do you have an opinion here? I don't mind adding linux-scsi, but > I think the Xen list is the appropriate one for pvSCSI. It depends how you want to handle this, but the patches have to come on to the SCSI list somehow. You can have them directly posted by adding the list, or you can repost them yourselves. It's a question of workflow. James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
