On 08/13/2014 04:09 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > On 8/6/2014 4:25 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > > Hey Boaz, > > So in the current flow, I still don't think it is wrong/buggy, the > transfer byte length related to scsi buffer length (In iscsi for sure > but I think that for all transports it is the same). > > But, > Since you have such a strong objection on this I'm also OK with changing > stuff... We can pass a buffer to scsi_transfer_length (although it has > no meaning effectively) and we can keep in/out_len local variables and > print them along with total transfer. > > Do you want me to send out a patch here (since I have some hardware to > test it...) or are you still planning to send out something? > I'll do it. As you said there is no bugs, just ugly code. I will send a cleanup Thanks Boaz > Cheers, > Sagi. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
