On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 14:54 +0530, Sreekanth Reddy wrote:
> So, the proposal is to allocate memory independently for each
> Reply Queue and pass down all of the addresses to the firmware.
> Then the firmware will just take each address and program the value
> into the correct register.
trivial note:
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_base.c b/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_base.c
[]
> @@ -1179,17 +1184,22 @@ static int
> _base_config_dma_addressing(struct MPT2SAS_ADAPTER *ioc, struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> struct sysinfo s;
> - char *desc = NULL;
> + u64 consistent_dma_mask;
> +
> + if (dma_mask)
> + consistent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(64);
> + else
> + consistent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
>
> if (sizeof(dma_addr_t) > 4) {
> const uint64_t required_mask =
> dma_get_required_mask(&pdev->dev);
> if ((required_mask > DMA_BIT_MASK(32)) && !pci_set_dma_mask(pdev,
> DMA_BIT_MASK(64)) && !pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(pdev,
> - DMA_BIT_MASK(64))) {
> + consistent_dma_mask)) {
This would be easier to read if the embedded functions
within the if were on separate lines like:
if ((required_mask > DMA_BIT_MASK(32)) &&
!pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64)) &&
!pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(pdev, consistent_dma_mask)) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
