Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 09:30:59PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> You realise that neither of these in linux-next as the scsi-core and
> scsi-drivers trees had for-3.16 branches in the last round.  I assume I
> should just drop these trees completely from linux-next?

Well, they get pulled in through James, so you can drop them for now.

I mostly put you on Cc so you could comment wether there are any hard
rules on how long even those simple fixes should be in linux-next.  I
know you've put up stats for a few of the last merge windows about
patches that weren't in linux-next, so there's been some tracking of it
for sure.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux