Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2 2/4] Introduce xen-scsifront module

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/01/2014 02:08 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 06:53:59AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
Hmm, I looked into scsi_add_device(). It seems as if the caller can't
distinguish between a new created and an already existing device. Am I
missing something?

That's right.  If you need that I still think it's better to add a
variant of scsi_add_device helping you with that.

I'm open to that solution.

Do you have preferences how to do it (IOW: can you give me a hint)?

The race is not existing: scsi_add_device() (and scsi_remove_device()
as well) for this scsi_host is called in scsifront_do_lun_hotplug()
only, and this function is always called in the same thread (xenbus
watch). A comment seems to be a good idea.

Do you disable scanning through procfs and sysfs as well?

No, I don't.

OTOH I don't think I see the problem. What could go wrong? Either
scsi_device_lookup() does find an existing device, then I refuse to add
it again. If I don't find it, it will be added. I can't see how any harm
would be done in either case when the device is added/removed between
the check and the action. What am I missing?

Juergen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux