On 07/21/2014 06:18 PM, John Utz wrote:
If I read Hanne's patch correctly, he is checking for the ZBC signature
> when the drives are probed.
Yep.
Thus, the only circumstance where adding zbc handling would lead to
> unexpected bad behavior in sd would be if a ZBC drive reported itself
> as a standard ATA drive or an ATA drive reported itself as a ZBC drive.
It's actually worse than that:
Currently libata will happily attach to a ZAC device, and passing them
on to the SCSI stack as a normal disk device.
Which most definitely will lead to unexpected results :-)
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
