Re: [PATCH 10/14] scsi: only maintain target_blocked if the driver has a target queue limit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/25/2014 06:51 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
This saves us an atomic operation for each I/O submission and completion
for the usual case where the driver doesn't set a per-target can_queue
value.  Only a few iscsi hardware offload drivers set the per-target
can_queue value at the moment.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
---
  drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c |   17 ++++++++++++-----
  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index a39d5ba..a64b9d3 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -295,7 +295,8 @@ void scsi_device_unbusy(struct scsi_device *sdev)
  	unsigned long flags;

  	atomic_dec(&shost->host_busy);
-	atomic_dec(&starget->target_busy);
+	if (starget->can_queue > 0)
+		atomic_dec(&starget->target_busy);

  	if (unlikely(scsi_host_in_recovery(shost) &&
  		     (shost->host_failed || shost->host_eh_scheduled))) {
@@ -1335,6 +1336,9 @@ static inline int scsi_target_queue_ready(struct Scsi_Host *shost,
  		spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock);
  	}

+	if (starget->can_queue <= 0)
+		return 1;
+
  	busy = atomic_inc_return(&starget->target_busy) - 1;
  	if (busy == 0 && atomic_read(&starget->target_blocked) > 0) {
  		if (atomic_dec_return(&starget->target_blocked) > 0)
@@ -1344,7 +1348,7 @@ static inline int scsi_target_queue_ready(struct Scsi_Host *shost,
  				 "unblocking target at zero depth\n"));
  	}

-	if (starget->can_queue > 0 && busy >= starget->can_queue)
+	if (busy >= starget->can_queue)
  		goto starved;
  	if (atomic_read(&starget->target_blocked) > 0)
  		goto starved;
@@ -1356,7 +1360,8 @@ starved:
  	list_move_tail(&sdev->starved_entry, &shost->starved_list);
  	spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock);
  out_dec:
-	atomic_dec(&starget->target_busy);
+	if (starget->can_queue > 0)
+		atomic_dec(&starget->target_busy);
  	return 0;
  }

@@ -1473,7 +1478,8 @@ static void scsi_kill_request(struct request *req, struct request_queue *q)
  	 */
  	atomic_inc(&sdev->device_busy);
  	atomic_inc(&shost->host_busy);
-	atomic_inc(&starget->target_busy);
+	if (starget->can_queue > 0)
+		atomic_inc(&starget->target_busy);

  	blk_complete_request(req);
  }
@@ -1642,7 +1648,8 @@ static void scsi_request_fn(struct request_queue *q)
  	return;

   host_not_ready:
-	atomic_dec(&scsi_target(sdev)->target_busy);
+	if (scsi_target(sdev)->can_queue > 0)
+		atomic_dec(&scsi_target(sdev)->target_busy);
   not_ready:
  	/*
  	 * lock q, handle tag, requeue req, and decrement device_busy. We

Hmm. 'can_queue' can be changed by the LLDD. Don't we need some sort of synchronization here?
(Or move that to atomic_t, too?)

Cheers,

Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
hare@xxxxxxx			      +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux