Re: [PATCH 09/14] scsi: fix the {host,target,device}_blocked counter mess

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/25/2014 06:51 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Seems like these counters are missing any sort of synchronization for
updates, as a over 10 year old comment from me noted.  Fix this by
using atomic counters, and while we're at it also make sure they are
in the same cacheline as the _busy counters and not needlessly stored
to in every I/O completion.

With the new model the _busy counters can temporarily go negative,
so all the readers are updated to check for > 0 values.  Longer
term every successful I/O completion will reset the counters to zero,
so the temporarily negative values will not cause any harm.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
---
  drivers/scsi/scsi.c        |   21 ++++++------
  drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c    |   82 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
  drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c  |   10 +++++-
  include/scsi/scsi_device.h |    7 ++--
  include/scsi/scsi_host.h   |    7 ++--
  5 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
index 35a23e2..b362058 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
@@ -729,17 +729,16 @@ void scsi_finish_command(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)

  	scsi_device_unbusy(sdev);

-        /*
-         * Clear the flags which say that the device/host is no longer
-         * capable of accepting new commands.  These are set in scsi_queue.c
-         * for both the queue full condition on a device, and for a
-         * host full condition on the host.
-	 *
-	 * XXX(hch): What about locking?
-         */
-        shost->host_blocked = 0;
-	starget->target_blocked = 0;
-        sdev->device_blocked = 0;
+	/*
+	 * Clear the flags which say that the device/target/host is no longer
+	 * capable of accepting new commands.
+	 */
+	if (atomic_read(&shost->host_blocked))
+		atomic_set(&shost->host_blocked, 0);
+	if (atomic_read(&starget->target_blocked))
+		atomic_set(&starget->target_blocked, 0);
+	if (atomic_read(&sdev->device_blocked))
+		atomic_set(&sdev->device_blocked, 0);

  	/*
  	 * If we have valid sense information, then some kind of recovery
Hmm. I guess there is a race window between
atomic_read() and atomic_set().
Doesn't this cause issues when someone calls atomic_set() just before the call to atomic_read?

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index e23fef5..a39d5ba 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -99,14 +99,16 @@ scsi_set_blocked(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd, int reason)
  	 */
  	switch (reason) {
  	case SCSI_MLQUEUE_HOST_BUSY:
-		host->host_blocked = host->max_host_blocked;
+		atomic_set(&host->host_blocked, host->max_host_blocked);
  		break;
  	case SCSI_MLQUEUE_DEVICE_BUSY:
  	case SCSI_MLQUEUE_EH_RETRY:
-		device->device_blocked = device->max_device_blocked;
+		atomic_set(&device->device_blocked,
+			   device->max_device_blocked);
  		break;
  	case SCSI_MLQUEUE_TARGET_BUSY:
-		starget->target_blocked = starget->max_target_blocked;
+		atomic_set(&starget->target_blocked,
+			   starget->max_target_blocked);
  		break;
  	}
  }
@@ -351,30 +353,39 @@ static void scsi_single_lun_run(struct scsi_device *current_sdev)
  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
  }

-static inline int scsi_device_is_busy(struct scsi_device *sdev)
+static inline bool scsi_device_is_busy(struct scsi_device *sdev)
  {
  	if (atomic_read(&sdev->device_busy) >= sdev->queue_depth)
-		return 1;
-	if (sdev->device_blocked)
-		return 1;
+		return true;
+	if (atomic_read(&sdev->device_blocked) > 0)
+		return true;
  	return 0;
  }

-static inline int scsi_target_is_busy(struct scsi_target *starget)
+static inline bool scsi_target_is_busy(struct scsi_target *starget)
  {
-	return ((starget->can_queue > 0 &&
-		 atomic_read(&starget->target_busy) >= starget->can_queue) ||
-		 starget->target_blocked);
+	if (starget->can_queue > 0) {
+		if (atomic_read(&starget->target_busy) >= starget->can_queue)
+			return true;
+		if (atomic_read(&starget->target_blocked) > 0)
+			return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
  }

-static inline int scsi_host_is_busy(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
+static inline bool scsi_host_is_busy(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
  {
-	if ((shost->can_queue > 0 &&
-	     atomic_read(&shost->host_busy) >= shost->can_queue) ||
-	    shost->host_blocked || shost->host_self_blocked)
-		return 1;
+	if (shost->can_queue > 0) {
+		if (atomic_read(&shost->host_busy) >= shost->can_queue)
+			return true;
+		if (atomic_read(&shost->host_blocked) > 0)
+			return true;
+		if (shost->host_self_blocked)
+			return true;
+	}

-	return 0;
+	return false;
  }

  static void scsi_starved_list_run(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
@@ -1283,11 +1294,8 @@ static inline int scsi_dev_queue_ready(struct request_queue *q,
  	unsigned int busy;

  	busy = atomic_inc_return(&sdev->device_busy) - 1;
-	if (busy == 0 && sdev->device_blocked) {
-		/*
-		 * unblock after device_blocked iterates to zero
-		 */
-		if (--sdev->device_blocked != 0) {
+	if (busy == 0 && atomic_read(&sdev->device_blocked) > 0) {
+		if (atomic_dec_return(&sdev->device_blocked) > 0) {
  			blk_delay_queue(q, SCSI_QUEUE_DELAY);
  			goto out_dec;
  		}
@@ -1297,7 +1305,7 @@ static inline int scsi_dev_queue_ready(struct request_queue *q,

  	if (busy >= sdev->queue_depth)
  		goto out_dec;
-	if (sdev->device_blocked)
+	if (atomic_read(&sdev->device_blocked) > 0)
  		goto out_dec;

  	return 1;
@@ -1328,16 +1336,9 @@ static inline int scsi_target_queue_ready(struct Scsi_Host *shost,
  	}

  	busy = atomic_inc_return(&starget->target_busy) - 1;
-	if (busy == 0 && starget->target_blocked) {
-		/*
-		 * unblock after target_blocked iterates to zero
-		 */
-		spin_lock_irq(shost->host_lock);
-		if (--starget->target_blocked != 0) {
-			spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock);
+	if (busy == 0 && atomic_read(&starget->target_blocked) > 0) {
+		if (atomic_dec_return(&starget->target_blocked) > 0)
  			goto out_dec;
-		}
-		spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock);

  		SCSI_LOG_MLQUEUE(3, starget_printk(KERN_INFO, starget,
  				 "unblocking target at zero depth\n"));
@@ -1345,7 +1346,7 @@ static inline int scsi_target_queue_ready(struct Scsi_Host *shost,

  	if (starget->can_queue > 0 && busy >= starget->can_queue)
  		goto starved;
-	if (starget->target_blocked)
+	if (atomic_read(&starget->target_blocked) > 0)
  		goto starved;

  	return 1;
@@ -1374,16 +1375,9 @@ static inline int scsi_host_queue_ready(struct request_queue *q,
  		return 0;

  	busy = atomic_inc_return(&shost->host_busy) - 1;
-	if (busy == 0 && shost->host_blocked) {
-		/*
-		 * unblock after host_blocked iterates to zero
-		 */
-		spin_lock_irq(shost->host_lock);
-		if (--shost->host_blocked != 0) {
-			spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock);
+	if (busy == 0 && atomic_read(&shost->host_blocked) > 0) {
+		if (atomic_dec_return(&shost->host_blocked) > 0)
  			goto out_dec;
-		}
-		spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock);

  		SCSI_LOG_MLQUEUE(3,
  			shost_printk(KERN_INFO, shost,
Same with this one.

Cheers,

Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
hare@xxxxxxx			      +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux