RE: [PATCH 3/3] scsi: ufs: retry if the link-startup fails

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Did you plan to change the arguments to ufshcd_is_device_present in a later patch?
I guess I overlooked it, thanks for bringing it to my attention.
I will resend the series without this patch.

Thanks,
Dolev
-- 
QUALCOMM ISRAEL, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation


-----Original Message-----
From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 1:37 PM
To: Dolev Raviv
Cc: James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-scsi-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; sthumma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; santoshsy@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] scsi: ufs: retry if the link-startup fails

This produces a compiler warning for me that looks serious:

../drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c: In function ‘ufshcd_link_startup’:
../drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c:1938:3: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘ufshcd_is_device_present’ makes integer from pointer without a cast [enabled by default]
../drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c:185:19: note: expected ‘u32’ but argument is of type ‘struct ufs_hba *’

Did you plan to change the arguments to ufshcd_is_device_present in a later patch?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux