On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 07:50:07AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 02:00:32AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> >
> > PS: I agree that it's worth careful commenting, obviously, but
> > before sending it to Linus (*with* comments) I want to get a
> > confirmation that this one-liner actually fixes what Ted is seeing.
> > I have reproduced it here, and that change makes the breakage go
> > away in my testing, but I'd like to make sure that we are seeing the
> > same thing. Ted?
>
> Hep, that fixes things. Thanks for explaining what was going on!
OK, here it is, hopefully with sufficient comments:
blkdev_read_iter() wants to cap the iov_iter by the amount of
data remaining to the end of device. That's what iov_iter_truncate()
is for (trim iter->count if it's above the given limit). So far,
so good, but the argument of iov_iter_truncate() is size_t, so on
32bit boxen (in case of a large device) we end up with that upper
limit truncated down to 32 bits *before* comparing it with iter->count.
Easily fixed by making iov_iter_truncate() take 64bit argument -
it does the right thing after such change (we only reach the
assignment in there when the current value of iter->count is greater
than the limit, i.e. for anything that would get truncated we don't
reach the assignment at all) and that argument is not the new
value of iter->count - it's an upper limit for such.
The overhead of passing u64 is not an issue - the thing is inlined,
so callers passing size_t won't pay any penalty.
Reported-by: Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
diff --git a/include/linux/uio.h b/include/linux/uio.h
index ddfdb53..17ae7e3 100644
--- a/include/linux/uio.h
+++ b/include/linux/uio.h
@@ -94,8 +94,20 @@ static inline size_t iov_iter_count(struct iov_iter *i)
return i->count;
}
-static inline void iov_iter_truncate(struct iov_iter *i, size_t count)
+/*
+ * Cap the iov_iter by given limit; note that the second argument is
+ * *not* the new size - it's upper limit for such. Passing it a value
+ * greater than the amount of data in iov_iter is fine - it'll just do
+ * nothing in that case.
+ */
+static inline void iov_iter_truncate(struct iov_iter *i, u64 count)
{
+ /*
+ * count doesn't have to fit in size_t - comparison extends both
+ * operands to u64 here and any value that would be truncated by
+ * conversion in assignement is by definition greater than all
+ * values of size_t, including old i->count.
+ */
if (i->count > count)
i->count = count;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
