>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Lars,
Lars> Any bio allocated that will be passed down with REQ_DISCARD has to
Lars> be allocated with nr_iovecs = 1 (at least), even though it must
Lars> not contain any bio_vec payload.
True. Although the correct answer is: Any discard request must be issued
by blkdev_issue_discard(). That's the interface.
The hacks we do to carry the information inside the bio constitute an
internal interface that is subject to change (it is just about to,
actually).
Lars> Though DRBD in 3.10 is not supposed to accept discard requests.
Lars> So I'm not sure how it manages to pass them down?
drbd_receiver.c:
static unsigned long wire_flags_to_bio(struct drbd_conf *mdev, u32 dpf)
{
return (dpf & DP_RW_SYNC ? REQ_SYNC : 0) |
(dpf & DP_FUA ? REQ_FUA : 0) |
(dpf & DP_FLUSH ? REQ_FLUSH : 0) |
(dpf & DP_DISCARD ? REQ_DISCARD : 0);
}
[...]
/* mirrored write */
static int receive_Data(struct drbd_tconn *tconn, struct packet_info
*pi)
{
[...]
dp_flags = be32_to_cpu(p->dp_flags);
rw |= wire_flags_to_bio(mdev, dp_flags);
[...]
That's pretty busticated. I suggest you simply remove REQ_DISCARD from
that helper for now.
It's also a good idea to disable discard and write same on the client
side when you set up the request queue:
blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, 0);
blk_queue_max_write_same_sectors(q, 0);
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
