On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 04:38:41AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 03:16:37PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > > > Given fcoe is quite mature now and its patches volume is very low, so > > > getting its kernel patches directly to scsi subsystem should work fine > > > and should be okay with James or Christophs to pull into scsi subsystem > > > directly once I've my non-author signoff ACK there as described in this > > > announcement at http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=140050839729415&w=2 > > > > > > If no alternate suggestion or objection to this then I'll formally > > > announce this on fcoe mailing list. > > > > > > However for any huges patches series bomb or RFCs, I'll request fcoe > > > developers to send patches against scsi tree at fcoe devel list first > > > and then if needed I can roll them up. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Vasu > > > > > Copy that Vasu, Christoph, is that ok with you? > > That's fine with me. It would help greatly if you could make sure > all the paches get a review or two very quickly so I can just pick them > up immediately after reviewing them. > > Roger that, Vasu has already acked this. I thought there was a second, but I'm not sure, my mailbox is a bit messed up at the moment. Sorry for not cc-ing you on this sooner, I thought it was going to go through the FCoE tree initially Best Neil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
