From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> The spinlock of tgt_lock is only for serializing read and write req_vq, one lockless seqcount is enough for the purpose. On one 16core VM with vhost-scsi backend, the patch can improve IOPS with 3% on random read test. Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [Add initialization in virtscsi_target_alloc. - Paolo] Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c index fc054935eb1f..f0b4cdbfceb0 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ #include <scsi/scsi_host.h> #include <scsi/scsi_device.h> #include <scsi/scsi_cmnd.h> +#include <linux/seqlock.h> #define VIRTIO_SCSI_MEMPOOL_SZ 64 #define VIRTIO_SCSI_EVENT_LEN 8 @@ -73,18 +74,16 @@ struct virtio_scsi_vq { * queue, and also lets the driver optimize the IRQ affinity for the virtqueues * (each virtqueue's affinity is set to the CPU that "owns" the queue). * - * tgt_lock is held to serialize reading and writing req_vq. Reading req_vq - * could be done locklessly, but we do not do it yet. + * tgt_seq is held to serialize reading and writing req_vq. * * Decrements of reqs are never concurrent with writes of req_vq: before the * decrement reqs will be != 0; after the decrement the virtqueue completion * routine will not use the req_vq so it can be changed by a new request. - * Thus they can happen outside the tgt_lock, provided of course we make reqs + * Thus they can happen outside the tgt_seq, provided of course we make reqs * an atomic_t. */ struct virtio_scsi_target_state { - /* This spinlock never held at the same time as vq_lock. */ - spinlock_t tgt_lock; + seqcount_t tgt_seq; /* Count of outstanding requests. */ atomic_t reqs; @@ -521,19 +520,33 @@ static struct virtio_scsi_vq *virtscsi_pick_vq(struct virtio_scsi *vscsi, unsigned long flags; u32 queue_num; - spin_lock_irqsave(&tgt->tgt_lock, flags); + local_irq_save(flags); + if (atomic_inc_return(&tgt->reqs) > 1) { + unsigned long seq; + + do { + seq = read_seqcount_begin(&tgt->tgt_seq); + vq = tgt->req_vq; + } while (read_seqcount_retry(&tgt->tgt_seq, seq)); + } else { + /* no writes can be concurrent because of atomic_t */ + write_seqcount_begin(&tgt->tgt_seq); + + /* keep previous req_vq if there is reader found */ + if (unlikely(atomic_read(&tgt->reqs) > 1)) { + vq = tgt->req_vq; + goto unlock; + } - if (atomic_inc_return(&tgt->reqs) > 1) - vq = tgt->req_vq; - else { queue_num = smp_processor_id(); while (unlikely(queue_num >= vscsi->num_queues)) queue_num -= vscsi->num_queues; - tgt->req_vq = vq = &vscsi->req_vqs[queue_num]; + unlock: + write_seqcount_end(&tgt->tgt_seq); } + local_irq_restore(flags); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tgt->tgt_lock, flags); return vq; } @@ -618,14 +631,17 @@ static int virtscsi_abort(struct scsi_cmnd *sc) static int virtscsi_target_alloc(struct scsi_target *starget) { + struct Scsi_Host *sh = dev_to_shost(starget->dev.parent); + struct virtio_scsi *vscsi = shost_priv(sh); + struct virtio_scsi_target_state *tgt = kmalloc(sizeof(*tgt), GFP_KERNEL); if (!tgt) return -ENOMEM; - spin_lock_init(&tgt->tgt_lock); + seqcount_init(&tgt->tgt_seq); atomic_set(&tgt->reqs, 0); - tgt->req_vq = NULL; + tgt->req_vq = &vscsi->req_vqs[0]; starget->hostdata = tgt; return 0; -- 1.8.3.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html