Re: [PATCH 7/8] be2iscsi: Fix processing cqe for cxn whose endpoint is freed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 07:22:07PM +0000, James Bottomley wrote:
> Actually, can you really pull it out, not just revert it?  Reverts cause
> problems with bisection and are unnecessary before the tree goes to
> Linus.
> 
> If preserving history becomes a real goal, we'd have to move to a tip
> like model, but I'm happy coping with the rebase that dropping a patch
> from a monolithic tree causes.

Linus has been very unappy about rebasing close to or in the merge
window, and other subsystems generally revert patches that late in the
cycle as well.  I'd prefer to stick to that model, but if you and Linus
prefer the rebase now I can do it as well of course.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux