Re: [Open-FCoE] [PATCH] bnx2fc: Improve stats update mechanism

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 02:59:43PM -0700, Eddie Wai wrote:
> Thanks for fixing this.  The patch generally looks good, but I do have a
> few comments.
> 
> On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 11:01 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > Recently had this warning reported:
> > 
> > [  290.489047] Call Trace:
> > [  290.489053]  [<ffffffff8169efec>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
> > [  290.489055]  [<ffffffff810ac7a9>] __might_sleep+0x179/0x230
> > [  290.489057]  [<ffffffff816a4ad5>] mutex_lock_nested+0x55/0x520
> > [  290.489061]  [<ffffffffa01b9905>] ? bnx2fc_l2_rcv_thread+0xc5/0x4c0 [bnx2fc]
> > [  290.489065]  [<ffffffffa0174c1a>] fc_vport_id_lookup+0x3a/0xa0 [libfc]
> > [  290.489068]  [<ffffffffa01b9a6c>] bnx2fc_l2_rcv_thread+0x22c/0x4c0 [bnx2fc]
> > [  290.489070]  [<ffffffffa01b9840>] ? bnx2fc_vport_destroy+0x110/0x110 [bnx2fc]
> > [  290.489073]  [<ffffffff8109e0cd>] kthread+0xed/0x100
> > [  290.489075]  [<ffffffff8109dfe0>] ? insert_kthread_work+0x80/0x80
> > [  290.489077]  [<ffffffff816b2fec>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
> > [  290.489078]  [<ffffffff8109dfe0>] ? insert_kthread_work+0x80/0x80
> > 
> > Its due to the fact that we call a potentially sleeping function from the bnx2fc
> > rcv path with preemption disabled (via the get_cpu call embedded in the per-cpu
> > variable stats lookup in bnx2fc_l2_rcv_thread.
> > 
> > Easy enough fix, we can just move the stats collection later in the function
> > where we are sure we won't preempt or sleep.  This also allows us to not have to
> > enable pre-emption when doing a per-cpu lookup, since we're certain not to get
> You mean this allows us to not have to 'disable' pre-emption, right? 
> 
> Can you elaborate on how we can be sure that we won't get preempted
> immediately after retrieving the CPU variable?  I would think it'll be
> okay to call get_cpu at this stage as there won't be any sleepable mutex
> lock calls before the put_cpu.
We can't be sure, but I would assert it doesn't really matter at this point.
The area in which we update stats is so small that, even if we do hit the
unlikely chance that we get pre-empted, and then rescheduled on a different cpu,
it won't matter.  We could add the get_cpu/put_cpu back if you're really intent
on it, but I'm not sure its worthwhile given that this is a hot path.

Neil

> > rescheduled.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > CC: Robert Love <robert.w.love@xxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c | 16 ++++------------
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c b/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c
> > index 9b94850..475eee5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c
> > @@ -516,23 +516,17 @@ static void bnx2fc_recv_frame(struct sk_buff *skb)
> >  	skb_pull(skb, sizeof(struct fcoe_hdr));
> >  	fr_len = skb->len - sizeof(struct fcoe_crc_eof);
> >  
> > -	stats = per_cpu_ptr(lport->stats, get_cpu());
> > -	stats->RxFrames++;
> > -	stats->RxWords += fr_len / FCOE_WORD_TO_BYTE;
> > -
> >  	fp = (struct fc_frame *)skb;
> >  	fc_frame_init(fp);
> >  	fr_dev(fp) = lport;
> >  	fr_sof(fp) = hp->fcoe_sof;
> >  	if (skb_copy_bits(skb, fr_len, &crc_eof, sizeof(crc_eof))) {
> > -		put_cpu();
> >  		kfree_skb(skb);
> >  		return;
> >  	}
> >  	fr_eof(fp) = crc_eof.fcoe_eof;
> >  	fr_crc(fp) = crc_eof.fcoe_crc32;
> >  	if (pskb_trim(skb, fr_len)) {
> > -		put_cpu();
> >  		kfree_skb(skb);
> >  		return;
> >  	}
> > @@ -544,7 +538,6 @@ static void bnx2fc_recv_frame(struct sk_buff *skb)
> >  		port = lport_priv(vn_port);
> >  		if (!ether_addr_equal(port->data_src_addr, dest_mac)) {
> >  			BNX2FC_HBA_DBG(lport, "fpma mismatch\n");
> > -			put_cpu();
> >  			kfree_skb(skb);
> >  			return;
> >  		}
> > @@ -552,7 +545,6 @@ static void bnx2fc_recv_frame(struct sk_buff *skb)
> >  	if (fh->fh_r_ctl == FC_RCTL_DD_SOL_DATA &&
> >  	    fh->fh_type == FC_TYPE_FCP) {
> >  		/* Drop FCP data. We dont this in L2 path */
> > -		put_cpu();
> >  		kfree_skb(skb);
> >  		return;
> >  	}
> > @@ -562,7 +554,6 @@ static void bnx2fc_recv_frame(struct sk_buff *skb)
> >  		case ELS_LOGO:
> >  			if (ntoh24(fh->fh_s_id) == FC_FID_FLOGI) {
> >  				/* drop non-FIP LOGO */
> > -				put_cpu();
> >  				kfree_skb(skb);
> >  				return;
> >  			}
> > @@ -572,22 +563,23 @@ static void bnx2fc_recv_frame(struct sk_buff *skb)
> >  
> >  	if (fh->fh_r_ctl == FC_RCTL_BA_ABTS) {
> >  		/* Drop incoming ABTS */
> > -		put_cpu();
> >  		kfree_skb(skb);
> >  		return;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	stats = per_cpu_ptr(lport->stats, smp_processor_id());
> > +	stats->RxFrames++;
> > +	stats->RxWords += fr_len / FCOE_WORD_TO_BYTE;
> > +
> >  	if (le32_to_cpu(fr_crc(fp)) !=
> >  			~crc32(~0, skb->data, fr_len)) {
> >  		if (stats->InvalidCRCCount < 5)
> >  			printk(KERN_WARNING PFX "dropping frame with "
> >  			       "CRC error\n");
> >  		stats->InvalidCRCCount++;
> > -		put_cpu();
> >  		kfree_skb(skb);
> >  		return;
> >  	}
> > -	put_cpu();
> >  	fc_exch_recv(lport, fp);
> >  }
> >  
> 
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux