Re: [PATCH 2/13 v2] [SCSI] qla2xxx: make return of 0 explicit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Acked-by: Saurav Kashyap <saurav.kashyap@xxxxxxxxxx>

>On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 07:36:48AM +0800, Julia Lawall wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, 19 May 2014, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> 
>> > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 04:07:52PM +0000, Saurav Kashyap wrote:
>> > > Hi Julia,
>> > >
>> > > Status is already set to 0 at the beginning of the function, I think
>> > > we should just "return status" here to be consistent with the rest
>>of
>> > > the function.
>> >
>> > "return 0;" is more clear than "return status;".
>> >
>> > Consistency is great so long as it makes the code easier to read.
>>Don't
>> > lose track of the real goal.
>> 
>> If status were an informative word, there might be a reason for it.  But
>> integer typed functions almost always return their status, so there is
>>no
>> real information.
>
>Just to be clear, I'm agreeing with you...  "return 0;" is better.
>
>regards,
>dan carpenter
>

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux