Hi Christoph, On Mon, 19 May 2014 07:06:14 -0700 Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'd like to announce the new scsi patch queue tree, which will pick up > any scsi core or driver patches promptly to allow easy integration and > feedback that contributors might be used to from other kernel subsystems. > > There are two branches, one for the SCSI core and upper level drivers, > and one for low-level (hardware) drivers: > > git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/scsi-queue.git core-for-3.16 > git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/scsi-queue.git drivers-for-3.16 > > The rules for the tree are: > > - it has at least two positive reviews (non-author signoff, reviewed-by > or acked-by tags). In practice this means it had at least one and > I added another one. > - no negative review on the mailing list > - it applies cleanly > - it compiles cleanly (drivers for architectures I can't test excluded) > - for core the core branch: survives a full xfstests run > > I went through the linux-scsi archives for March, April and May and > applied all patches that clearly fit the above criteria, but it's fairly > like I missed some. > > If I'm missing your patch(es): > > - resend it unless it was sent in the last few weeks > - make sure all reviews are recorded in the most recent post of the > patch(es) > - ping the list for additional reviewers > > For now the prime intent of the tree is to feed it to James, although > I'd welcome everyone interested to pull and test it. If the scheme > proves successful I'd love to invite more core scsi contributors to help > with it and move to a shared kernel.org tree. Is this a request for inclusion of those branches into linux-next separately from the scsi tree itself? -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
