On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 15:38 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > On 05/15/2014 07:26 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Hi James, > > > > we're past -rc5 and no SCSI patches have been collected for 3.16 yet, > > despite a lot of patches including a lot of reviewed ones pending on the > > list. > > > > I'd really love to get at least some testing for all the work that > > sometimes has been pending for months in linux-next and would offer to > > put together a tree of reviewed patches for linux-next. Is this fine > > with you? > > > Seconded. Having a staging tree would make my life _so_ much easier. OK, I think we can do this easily. Send me your staging branches and I'll pull them into a global staging branch and merge it with for-next in linux-scsi ... this will ensure we don't get yelled at for duplicate commits causing merge rejections in linux-next. Since staging will be volatile and for the purposes of testing patches on upstream track, we don't need signed tags or anything. James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
