On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 09:36:54AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > Have to look into this. Problem is that some eh_XXX callback > implementations actually are using the command to send the TMF; > will need to look into them how and if they could be changed. That's indeed a bit of a problem, guess we need to do an audit on how the commands are used at the moment. > Actually, alongside with that change I would update the arguments > to the callback functions to align with the strategy level; > eh_device_reset() would be getting struct scsi_device as argument, > eh_target_reset() would get getting struct scsi_target as argument etc. > > So the actual SCSI EH would not be tied to struct scsi_cmnd, and we > would just be needing something to send TUR etc in the course of > SCSI EH. Right. I think the commands should go through the normal BLOCK_PC code path, we'd just need to make sure they get priority in the request allocator. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
