On 03/28/2014 06:50 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > We unconditionally execute scsi_eh_get_sense() to make sure all failed > commands that should have sense attached, do. However, the routine forgets > that some commands, because of the way they fail, will not have any sense code > ... we should not bother them with a REQUEST_SENSE command. Fix this by > testing to see if we actually got a CHECK_CONDITION return and skip asking for > sense if we don't. > > Tested-by: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx> Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
