Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] scsi: async sd resume

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:29 PM, James Bottomley
<James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > In the long game, though this whole debate is moot: setups with hard
>> > wired start times adhere to them regardless of what the system does, so
>> > they ignore start unit commands.  Systems without hard wired start times
>> > can usually be started at once, so us introducing a delay is unnecessary
>> > in either case.
>>
>> Ok, then I'll let the patch stand as is.
>
> Sounds good.
>
> James
>
>

Well, one more chirp about this.  If the user has disabled async
scanning by CONFIG_SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC=n or scsi_mod.scan != "async" then
resume should follow suit.  I'll include this in the next rev.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux