On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 12:28 +0000, Saxena, Sumit wrote: > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Jasper Spaans [mailto:spaans@xxxxxxxxxx] > >Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 5:53 PM > >To: DL-MegaRAID Linux > >Cc: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >Subject: [PATCH] megaraid_sas: make the log message about rescanning > >more informative. > > > >Hi, > > > >I was working on one of our servers, and saw the following interesting > >message in dmesg: > > > >[20961024.720972] scanning ... > > > >This scared me somewhat. Please find a patch to make it easier to see where > >this message is coming from. > > > >Cheers, > >Jasper > > > >--- > > drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > >diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c > >b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c > >index 1f0ca68..3457289 100644 > >--- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c > >+++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c > >@@ -5461,7 +5461,7 @@ megasas_aen_polling(struct work_struct *work) > > } > > > > if (doscan) { > >- printk(KERN_INFO "scanning ...\n"); > >+ printk(KERN_INFO "Rescanning MegaRAID devices ...\n"); > > megasas_get_pd_list(instance); > > for (i = 0; i < MEGASAS_MAX_PD_CHANNELS; i++) { > > for (j = 0; j < MEGASAS_MAX_DEV_PER_CHANNEL; > >j++) { > >-- > >1.7.9.5 > Acked-by: Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@xxxxxxx> I'd prefer consistency for this: Most of the messages in this driver have a megasas: prefix ... but there are quite a large number that don't (and which probably should have). If this is necessary, please use the standard driver prefix. Thanks, James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
