[PATCH 1/3] blk-mq: remove blk_mq_alloc_rq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There's only one caller, which is a straight wrapper and fits the naming
scheme of the related functions a lot better.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
---
 block/blk-mq.c |   10 ++--------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 1fa9dd1..1e585e3 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ static void blk_mq_hctx_mark_pending(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 		set_bit(ctx->index_hw, hctx->ctx_map);
 }
 
-static struct request *blk_mq_alloc_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, gfp_t gfp,
-				       bool reserved)
+static struct request *__blk_mq_alloc_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
+					      gfp_t gfp, bool reserved)
 {
 	struct request *rq;
 	unsigned int tag;
@@ -193,12 +193,6 @@ static void blk_mq_rq_ctx_init(struct request_queue *q, struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx,
 	ctx->rq_dispatched[rw_is_sync(rw_flags)]++;
 }
 
-static struct request *__blk_mq_alloc_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
-					      gfp_t gfp, bool reserved)
-{
-	return blk_mq_alloc_rq(hctx, gfp, reserved);
-}
-
 static struct request *blk_mq_alloc_request_pinned(struct request_queue *q,
 						   int rw, gfp_t gfp,
 						   bool reserved)
-- 
1.7.10.4


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux