Re: [PATCH 2/5] scsi: improved eh timeout handler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Hannes,

I'll need a little reminder how we came to the conclusion that the
cancel_delayed_work in scsi_put_command was safe and we didn't need
a cancel_delayed_work_sync or flush_delayed_work.  I remember we had
that discussion, but it seems that same doesn't apply to the equivalent
call in the blk-mq codepath in my tree.  If you remember anything that
might make my life debugging this a bit easier.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux