On 02/06/2014 07:24 PM, Mike Christie wrote: > On 01/31/2014 03:29 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: >> We should be issuing STPG synchronously as we need to >> evaluate the return code on failure. >> >> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx> > > I think we need to also make dm-mpath.c use a non-ordered workqueue for > kmpath_handlerd. With this patch and the current ordered workqueue in > dm-mpath I think we will only be able to do one STPG at a time. I think > if we use a normal old non-ordered workqueue then we would be limited to > have max_active STPGs executing. I goofed and commented in the order I saw the patches :) I take this comment back for this patch, because I see in 16/16 you added a new workqueue to scsi_dh_alua to do rtpgs and stpgs. For 16/16 though, do we want to make kmpath_aluad a non single threaded workqueue? It looks like max_active for single threaded is only one work at a time too. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
