Re: [PATCH 13/17] scsi: push host_lock down into scsi_{host,target}_queue_ready

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/06/14 17:56, James Bottomley wrote:
> Could you benchmark this lot and show what the actual improvement is
> just for this series, if any?

I see a performance improvement of 12% with the SRP protocol for the
SCSI core optimizations alone (I am still busy measuring the impact of
the blk-mq conversion but I can already see that it is really
significant). Please note that the performance impact depends a lot on
the workload (number of LUNs per SCSI host e.g.) so maybe the workload I
chose is not doing justice to Christoph's work. And it's also important
to mention that with the workload I ran I was saturating the target
system CPU (a quad core Intel i5). In other words, results might be
better with a more powerful target system.

Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux