On 02/03/2014 09:55 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
"David" == David Milburn <dmilburn@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
David> When enabling DIX T10-DIF-TYPE1-IP protection you can hit the
David> bip_vec full condition which fails to attach the integrity
David> metadata and returns 0 back to bio_integrity_prep()
Looks like Kent accidentally broke this when he changed the bvec pool
setup.
David> - if (bip->bip_vcnt >= bvec_nr_vecs(bip->bip_slab)) {
David> + if (bip->bip_slab != BIO_POOL_NONE &&
David> + bip->bip_vcnt >= bvec_nr_vecs(bip->bip_slab)) {
David> printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bip_vec full\n", __func__);
David> return 0;
David> }
We still need to check that the page will actually fit, though:
block: Fix nr_vecs for inline integrity vectors
Commit 9f060e2231ca changed the way we handle allocations for the
integrity vectors. When the vectors are inline there is no associated
slab and consequently bvec_nr_vecs() returns 0. Ensure that we check
against BIP_INLINE_VECS in that case.
Reported-by: David Milburn <dmilburn@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/fs/bio-integrity.c b/fs/bio-integrity.c
index fc60b31453ee..6dea2b90b4d5 100644
--- a/fs/bio-integrity.c
+++ b/fs/bio-integrity.c
@@ -114,6 +114,14 @@ void bio_integrity_free(struct bio *bio)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_integrity_free);
+static inline unsigned int bip_integrity_vecs(struct bio_integrity_payload *bip)
+{
+ if (bip->bip_slab == BIO_POOL_NONE)
+ return BIP_INLINE_VECS;
+
+ return bvec_nr_vecs(bip->bip_slab);
+}
+
/**
* bio_integrity_add_page - Attach integrity metadata
* @bio: bio to update
@@ -129,7 +137,7 @@ int bio_integrity_add_page(struct bio *bio, struct page *page,
struct bio_integrity_payload *bip = bio->bi_integrity;
struct bio_vec *iv;
- if (bip->bip_vcnt >= bvec_nr_vecs(bip->bip_slab)) {
+ if (bip->bip_vcnt >= bip_integrity_vecs(bip)) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bip_vec full\n", __func__);
return 0;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Hi Martin,
Your patch has been tested successfully.
Thanks for your help,
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html