On 1/22/14 1:54 AM, "Bart Van Assche" <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> wrote: >On 01/16/14 23:35, Giridhar Malavali wrote: >> On 1/10/14 10:27 AM, "Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> I would like to attend to participate in discussions related to topics >>> listed in the subject. As a maintainer of DM I'd be interested to >>> learn/discuss areas that should become a development focus in the >>>months >>> following LSF. >> >> +1 for scsi-mq. > >(removed lsf-pc from CC-list) > >Hello Giridhar, > >I definitely appreciate QLogic's continuous efforts to improve >performance of their initiator and target drivers. Via your e-mail I >learned that QLogic is looking at scsi-mq, which is great news. However, >the following issue might have to be addressed before the qla2xxx driver >can fully take advantage of the scsi-mq work: >https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69201. It would be >appreciated if someone could have a look at the measurements described >in that bugzilla entry. One of our internal runs have indicated lock contention issues and we are working on this actively. We will be posting the patches once we are done with it. Thanks for bringing this to our attention. -- Giri > >Thanks, > >Bart.
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
