On 1/22/2014 12:17 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
On Sun, 2014-01-19 at 14:12 +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
On 1/19/2014 4:44 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
This patch adds support to target_submit_cmd_map_sgls() for
accepting 'sgl_prot' + 'sgl_prot_count' parameters for
DIF protection information.
Note the passed parameters are stored at se_cmd->t_prot_sg
and se_cmd->t_prot_nents respectively.
Also, update tcm_loop and vhost-scsi fabrics usage of
target_submit_cmd_map_sgls() to take into account the
new parameters.
I didn't see that you added protection allocation to transports that
does not use
target_submit_cmd_map_sgls() - which happens to be iSCSI/iSER/SRP :(
Don't you think that prot SG allocation should be added also to
target_alloc_sgl()? by then
se_cmd should contain the protection attributes and this routine can
know if it needs to
allocate prot_sg as well. This is how I used it...
Yes, this specific bit was left out for the moment as no code in the
patch for v3.14 actually uses it..
I'm planning to add it to for-next -> v3.15 code as soon as the merge
window closes.
--nab
Yes, that makes sense to me.
Sagi.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
