Re: [PATCH-v2 11/17] target/iblock: Add blk_integrity + BIP passthrough support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "nab" == Nicholas A Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Please remind me why we ignore IP-CSUM guard type again?  MKP, will
>> this be irrelevant for the initiator as well? if so, I don't see a
>> reason to expose this in RDMA verbs.

nab> My understanding is that this was used for pre-production
nab> prototyping, and is not supported by any real backend storage
nab> hardware.

We are shipping several products with support for the IP checksum. But
it's between application and initiator only. From there on it's all T10
CRC as required by the spec.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux