Re: [LSF/MM ATTEND] interest in blk-mq, scsi-mq, dm-cache, dm-thinp, dm-*

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/16/2014 6:34 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
On 1/10/2014 8:27 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
I would like to attend to participate in discussions related to topics
listed in the subject.  As a maintainer of DM I'd be interested to
learn/discuss areas that should become a development focus in the months
following LSF.


+1 for scsi-mq.

Sparing a few words on why I voted on this topic,
As part of me being involved in fast RDMA based initiators (iSER, SRP) I can say that SCSI layer became a real performance bottleneck. Implementations bypassing SCSI has started to pop-up lately. scsi-mq can and should boost performance and it is important that we work also on LLDs to
provide a total solution.

Sagi.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux