> -----Original Message----- > From: Tomas Henzl [mailto:thenzl@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 9:14 AM > To: Miller, Mike (OS Dev); Andrew Morton; James E. J. Bottomley > Cc: LKML; LKML-scsi; hare@xxxxxxx; Stephen M. Cameron > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] scsi: hpsa, add all PCI ID's that HP has in svn > > On 01/16/2014 08:51 PM, Mike Miller wrote: > > From: Mike Miller <mike.miller@xxxxxx> > > > > This patch has every ID we have in our svn repository. Some > > controllers were cancelled, others added, now the cancelled ones are > > back. Apparently the debate rages on about which controllers are > > cancelled, which are not, whatever. Please accept this patch. It is > > dependent upon the patches I sent yesterday. > > This patch made/tested against kernel-3.13.0-rc8 > > > > Signed-off-by: Mike Miller <mike.miller@xxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/scsi/hpsa.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > > 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c b/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c index > > 348b207..3affec5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c > > @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id > hpsa_pci_device_id[] = { > > {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSF, 0x103C, > 0x3354}, > > {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSF, 0x103C, > 0x3355}, > > {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSF, 0x103C, > 0x3356}, > > + {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH, 0x103C, > 0x1920}, > > {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH, 0x103C, > 0x1921}, > > {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH, 0x103C, > 0x1922}, > > {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH, 0x103C, > 0x1923}, > > @@ -108,15 +109,19 @@ static const struct pci_device_id > hpsa_pci_device_id[] = { > > {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH, 0x103C, > 0x1926}, > > {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH, 0x103C, > 0x1928}, > > {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH, 0x103C, > 0x1929}, > > + {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSH, 0x103C, > 0x192A}, > > {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > 0x21BD}, > > {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > 0x21BE}, > > {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > 0x21BF}, > > {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > 0x21C0}, > > {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > 0x21C2}, > > {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > 0x21C3}, > > + {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > 0x21C4}, > > {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > 0x21C5}, > > + {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > 0x21C6}, > > {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > 0x21C7}, > > {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > 0x21C8}, > > + {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > 0x21C9}, > > {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > 0x21CA}, > > {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > 0x21CB}, > > {PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HP_CISSI, 0x103C, > 0x21CC}, > > @@ -149,22 +154,29 @@ static struct board_type products[] = { > > {0x3354103C, "Smart Array P420i", &SA5_access}, > > {0x3355103C, "Smart Array P220i", &SA5_access}, > > {0x3356103C, "Smart Array P721m", &SA5_access}, > > + {0x1920103C, "Smart Array P430i", &SA5_access}, > > {0x1921103C, "Smart Array P830i", &SA5_access}, > > {0x1922103C, "Smart Array P430", &SA5_access}, > > {0x1923103C, "Smart Array P431", &SA5_access}, > > {0x1924103C, "Smart Array P830", &SA5_access}, > > + {0x1925103C, "Smart Array P831", &SA5_access}, > > {0x1926103C, "Smart Array P731m", &SA5_access}, > > {0x1928103C, "Smart Array P230i", &SA5_access}, > > {0x1929103C, "Smart Array P530", &SA5_access}, > > + {0x192A103C, "Smart Array P531", &SA5_access}, > > {0x21BD103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access}, > > {0x21BE103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access}, > > {0x21BF103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access}, > > {0x21C0103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access}, > > + {0x21C1103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access}, > > I think that both tables should be in sync - but there is no 0x21c1 in > hpsa_pci_device_id (and the 0x1925), could you clarify that? > > Thanks, Tomas Crap. It seems like these menial tasks get the better of me. I'll correct and resubmit. -- mikem > > > {0x21C2103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access}, > > {0x21C3103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access}, > > + {0x21C4103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access}, > > {0x21C5103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access}, > > + {0x21C6103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access}, > > {0x21C7103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access}, > > {0x21C8103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access}, > > + {0x21C9103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access}, > > {0x21CA103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access}, > > {0x21CB103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access}, > > {0x21CC103C, "Smart Array", &SA5_access}, > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" > > in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More > majordomo > > info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
