Re: [PATCH 02/11] IB/isert: seperate connection protection domains and dma MRs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Sagi,

On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 18:40 +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> It is more correct to seperate connections protection domains
> and dma_mr handles. protection information support requires to
> do so.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c |   46 ++++++++++++++++---------------
>  drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.h |    2 -
>  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 

Applied to for-next, given this patch does not depend on the proposed
VERBS protection changes.

--nab 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux