Re: [PATCH 07/14] target/sbc: Add P_TYPE + PROT_EN bits to READ_CAPACITY_16

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/12/2014 2:33 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
"Sagi" == Sagi Grimberg <sagig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
I don't know of any non-disk devices that actually implement FORMAT
UNIT. Usually such configuration is done using the array management
interface.
Sagi> So this takes me to a corner I still don't understand, if a LUN is
Sagi> pre-formatted as T10-protected, what happens to unwritten blocks
Sagi> read?  I mean, SCSI login executes some reads from sevel LBAs
Sagi> which will probably fail as blocks are unwritten.

Per SBC, PI must be initialized to 0xffffffffffffffff. Since an app tag
value of 0xffff is an escape, this will prevent both target and
initiator from performing PI-verification when that block is read.

OK, so this is an implicit escape (which will become explicit in DIX1.1?). So I will open that in DIF RDMA verbs.

If a block is subsequently written and no PI is sent from the host
(WRPROTECT=0), the target must generate valid PI for each block.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux