On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Sagi Grimberg <sagig@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In case of protected transactions, we will need to check the > protection status of the transaction before sending SCSI response. > So be ready for RDMA_WRITE completions. currently we don't ask > for these completions, but for T10-PI we will. > @@ -1721,9 +1735,9 @@ __isert_send_completion(struct iser_tx_desc *tx_desc, > isert_conn, ib_dev); > break; > case ISER_IB_RDMA_WRITE: > - pr_err("isert_send_completion: Got ISER_IB_RDMA_WRITE\n"); > - dump_stack(); > - break; > + pr_debug("isert_send_completion: Got ISER_IB_RDMA_WRITE\n"); > + atomic_dec(&isert_conn->post_send_buf_count); > + isert_completion_rdma_write(tx_desc, isert_cmd); are we doing fall through here? why? > case ISER_IB_RDMA_READ: > pr_debug("isert_send_completion: Got ISER_IB_RDMA_READ:\n"); > > -- > 1.7.1 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html