>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Christie <michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> 2. report_opcode is optional in SPC-3, so it's possible that not all >> iscsi target support it. But is it correct for microsoft iSCSI target >> to reject the command rather than return it with normal SCSI >> response? Mike> The iscsi spec has the reason code "command not supported" so I Mike> guess it is ok for the target to do this. I do not think I have Mike> ever seen that reason code used in production level targets, so it Mike> is probably not common. It's kind of unfriendly to not send a check condition... Mike> I think we should implement handling in the iscsi layer for it. I Mike> can make a patch if you have not already. It would be awfully nice to get it turned into an ILLEGAL REQUEST/0x20/0x0. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
