Re: REQ_PM vs REQ_TYPE_PM_RESUME

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 9 Jan 2014, Phillip Susi wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 1/9/2014 11:14 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
> > That's true, but it isn't a problem.  We know that requests with
> > REQ_PM are sent only at certain, controlled times.  In particular,
> > the only time such a request would be sent while the disk is
> > RPM_SUSPENDED is during a system resume.
> 
> Yes, but if the disk and port were both already RPM_SUSPENDED when the
> system was suspended, and so the port is still RPM_SUSPENDED when the
> disk's system resume method is called, then it can't communicate with
> the disk.

The port should not be runtime suspended during system resume.  It 
should always go to runtime active.
 
> >> We need to put the device into one of the transitioning states
> >> to block other IO, without allowing the port to suspend.
> > 
> > No, we only need to make sure that the port doesn't go into runtime
> >  suspend while we carry out the "is the disk spinning" test.
> 
> Well how else do you do that other than with the transition states?

pm_runtime_get_noresume(dev->parent).

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux