On 01/08/2014 09:16 AM, Phillip Susi wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 01/07/2014 08:03 PM, Aaron Lu wrote: >> You mean you want to leave the disk runtime suspended after a >> system resume and in the meantime make sure the disk is indeed not >> spun up? > > Yep. If it is spun up, then the runtime status should be updated to > reflect that, otherwise it tricks user space programs into avoiding > doing IO to the disk for fear of waking it, and prevents the runtime > autosuspend timer from kicking in. The ATA and SCSI devices are all resumed in my patches, notice there is a single pm_request_resume call in both ATA and SCSI's system resume callback, so the runtime status and the disk's state is synced. The pm_request_resume call is asynchronous to the system resume, so it doesn't block system resume. But I see your point, my patch will not achieve that, it can only speed up S3 for a typical PC with a traditional disk. I can omit the pm_request_resume call in the system resume callback, but then if the disk is spun up by itself, then the runtime status indeed doesn't reflect the actual state. I suppose for SATA controllers that support Staggered Spin-up wouldn't do this? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
