Re: Persistent reservation behaviour/compliance with redundant controllers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2014/1/7 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 23:53 +0100, Matthias Eble wrote:
>>
>> Can sdg and sdl be the same I_T_Nexus at a time?
>> Right now, they are handled like that.
>> In my understanding, every scsi disk device represents an I_T_Nexus.
>
> No, every SCSI disk is an I_T_L nexus.  There's no actual device object
> in Linux for an I_T nexus.

So, PR registrations are made for an I_T nexus using an I_T_L nexus.
Probably my previous systems had a 1:1 relation between I_T and I_T_L.

Is there a way to identify which I_T_L nexuses belong to the same I_T nexus?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux