On 11/25/2013 01:03 PM, Aleksey Dashevsky wrote: > Dear Hannes, > > I'm wondering what happens to your patch set with Linux 64-bit LUN > support? As far as I understand you'd got few more SCSI related > patches in your drawer > (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg69428.html), but they > have been pushed upstream recently. > Currently I'm trying to excite any comment from James B. after the latest respin of my eh-timeout patchset. In _principle_ the patchset is now clean, and everyone agrees it should get in. But as long as James B. doesn't react here I don't see a point in sending my other patches, as they sort of rely on each other. Currently I have these patchsets queued: - eh-timeout - per-device logging level support - 64-bit LUN support - Further EH improvements: - remove duplicate hooks - move eh_host_reset_handler to take 'struct Scsi_Host' as argument, etc. I was planning to send the per-device logging level support in the next round, as this is touching quite a lot of areas, but it's probably the most uncontroversial. 64-bit LUN support will be sent afterwards, as this needs some modifications to the LLDDs, some of which cannot handle 64-bit LUNs without internal modifications. And I would need to discuss with the vendors of how to handle these issues. But then, as even the first patchset hasn't moved forward in the recent weeks I fail to see the point in sending the others, as I cannot be sure if and when the first one is getting in. If there is interest I can put these patches up to my git repository, of course. Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
