Hi Arnd, I looked at the PHY generic framework and come across this statement below. Our SATA PHY is embedded into the SoC. Should I ignore this statement below and implement the PHY driver using this framework? +This framework will be of use only to devices that use external PHY (PHY +functionality is not embedded within the controller). -Loc On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tuesday 12 November 2013, Loc Ho wrote: >> Hi Arnd/Olof, >> >> I looked over the phy code for USB and NET. There isn't such PHY >> infrastructure for SATA from what I can tell. It seems like I will >> need to put this all together. I am thinking about porting the USB >> version over (with changes for SATA) and put it under >> "./drivers/ata/phy". Any suggestion? > > Please have a look at the patches under the subject "Generic PHY Framework" > posted by Kishon Vijay Abraham. I thought they would have made it in > by now, but I have not followed the recent kernels closely since I am > on parental leave at the moment. > > IIRC they should unify USB, SATA and other PHY codes, but not network. > > Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
